Census 2024 · district in Ankole sub-region
Mitooma
- People
- 226,009
- 91 of 146 by size
- Area
- 548 km²
- People per km²
- 412
- Uganda: 189
- Household size
- 4.4
- Uganda: 4.2
- Children under 18
- 46.1%
- Uganda: 49.6%
Where Mitooma is
Where Mitooma does better than Uganda
- Children 6–12 out of school: 17.9% vs 26.0% nationally
- Youth 18–30 not in work, school or training: 43.0% vs 50.9% nationally
- Teens 13–17 out of school: 26.5% vs 34.2% nationally
Where Mitooma lags behind
- Households with safe drinking water: 55.8% vs 81.1% nationally
- Households on grid electricity: 8.4% vs 25.3% nationally
- Households with improved toilets: 28.0% vs 43.6% nationally
Mitooma compared
- Mitooma
- Ankole
- Uganda
Education
- 0%127th highest of 146 · Ankole 20.3% · Uganda 26.0%50%
- 0%127th highest of 146 · Ankole 31.6% · Uganda 34.2%50%
Jobs
- 0%117th highest of 146 · Ankole 39.8% · Uganda 50.9%100%
- 0%129th highest of 146 · Ankole 8.1% · Uganda 12.6%25%
- 0%79th highest of 146 · Ankole 27.8% · Uganda 33.1%50%
- 0%31st highest of 146 · Ankole 8.6% · Uganda 7.8%25%
Homes
- 0%72nd highest of 146 · Ankole 20.7% · Uganda 25.3%50%
- 0%7th highest of 146 · Ankole 43.6% · Uganda 28.1%100%
- 0%135th highest of 146 · Ankole 63.3% · Uganda 81.1%100%
- 0%95th highest of 146 · Ankole 40.6% · Uganda 43.6%50%
- 0%137th highest of 146 · Ankole 1.7% · Uganda 6.7%25%
Health
- 0%9th highest of 146 · Ankole 89.3% · Uganda 87.2%100%
- 0%110th highest of 146 · Ankole 0.8% · Uganda 1.0%25%
- 0%66th highest of 146 · Ankole 10.9% · Uganda 11.4%25%
Connected
- 0%60th highest of 146 · Ankole 5.5% · Uganda 6.1%25%
- 0%15th highest of 146 · Ankole 48.4% · Uganda 41.0%100%
- Households with a TV17.3%0%54th highest of 146 · Ankole 23.7% · Uganda 23.1%50%
Inside Mitooma: 18 sub-counties
Pick a question to compare every sub-county in Mitooma.
Households on grid electricity
By sub-county, Census 2024
Who has power from the grid? Mitooma overall: 8.4%
Highest: Kashenshero Town Council (28.3%). Lowest: Rwoburunga (0.0%).
| Sub-county | County | Households on grid electricity |
|---|---|---|
| Kashenshero Town Council | Ruhinda County | 28.3% |
| Mitooma Town Council | Ruhinda County | 22.9% |
| Kabira Town Council | Ruhinda South County | 18.5% |
| Katenga | Ruhinda County | 17.4% |
| Rutookye Town Council | Ruhinda North County | 12.9% |
| Mitooma | Ruhinda County | 10.6% |
| Mutara Town Council | Ruhinda South County | 9.9% |
| Kanyabwanga | Ruhinda North County | 9.3% |
| Kabira | Ruhinda South County | 7.3% |
| Mayanga | Ruhinda South County | 5.3% |
| Bitereko | Ruhinda North County | 4.0% |
| Kashenshero | Ruhinda County | 3.6% |
| Mutara | Ruhinda South County | 3.2% |
| Kigyende | Ruhinda North County | 1.9% |
| Rurehe | Ruhinda South County | 1.2% |
| Nyakizinga | Ruhinda South County | 0.2% |
| Kiyanga | Ruhinda North County | 0.1% |
| Rwoburunga | Ruhinda North County | 0.0% |
Farming in Mitooma
| Mitooma | Ankole | Uganda | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Households keeping livestock | 79.1% | 69.4% | 72.8% | 62nd of 135 |
| Cattle per 100 people | 14.3 per 100 people | 49.8 per 100 people | 31.5 per 100 people | 113th of 135 |
| Goats per 100 people | 41.4 per 100 people | 54.9 per 100 people | 37.8 per 100 people | 49th of 135 |
| Chickens per 100 people | 53.5 per 100 people | 73.5 per 100 people | 126.0 per 100 people | 117th of 135 |
| Pigs per 100 people | 22.1 per 100 people | 17.1 per 100 people | 15.4 per 100 people | 36th of 135 |
| Cattle that are exotic or cross-bred | 55.9% | 60.3% | 23.0% | 18th of 135 |
| Honey harvested (kg, 6 months) | 13,298 kg | 176,327 kg | 2,567,298 kg | 46th of 135 |
Source: UBOS, National Livestock Census 2021. Animals per 100 people use the 2024 census population.
Other districts in Ankole
About these numbers
From the National Population and Housing Census 2024. Shares are worked out from UBOS’s counts for Mitooma. The Ankole and Uganda figures come from summed counts, not averages. “Highest of 146” ranks show where Mitooma sits among all districts and cities, from highest value down. For some indicators, a high rank is good news; for others it isn’t.
Note: UBOS's mobile phone ownership table currently repeats the internet-use figures, so phone ownership is left out.